Recommendation 1: Counseling about Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR)-related Disease Spectrum
While most positive CF carrier screening results identify mutations associated with classic CF disease, genetic counselors offering CF carrier screening should ensure that they are providing the most current information to patients regarding the range of symptoms, potential treatment options, and quality of life issues associated with CF and the CFTR-related disease spectrum.
Recommendation 2: To Whom Should Carrier Testing for CF Be Offered?
Carrier testing for CF should be offered to all women of reproductive age, regardless of ancestry; preferably preconceptionally. CF carrier testing should also be offered to any individual with a family history of CF and to partners of mutation carriers and people with CF.
Recommendation 3: Pre-test Risk Assessment
Pre-test risk assessment should include an estimate of CF carrier frequency based on the individual's family history, ethnic background, and the predicted residual risk to have a child with CF if the test is negative.
Recommendation 4: CF Carrier Test Selection
Carrier testing panels should include the mutations recommended by the College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the American College of Medical Genetics (ACMG). For individuals of non-Northern European descent, pan-ethnic panels that include additional mutations more commonly identified in minority populations are appropriate to consider. Focus general population CF screening practices on identifying carriers of established disease-causing CFTR mutations.
Recommendation 5: Changes in Testing Panels and Interpretation
The inclusion and exclusion of mutations on available CFTR mutation screening panels remains a dynamic process as new information is learned about the pathogenicity of CFTR mutations. When individuals present for genetic counseling with prior carrier screening results, those results should be reviewed and re-interpreted, if necessary, in light of current knowledge.
Recommendation 6: Communicating Negative and +/− Carrier Screening Results
Clients who have had a negative CF carrier screening test result should be informed of their reduced or residual risk to have a child with cystic fibrosis, and the possibility of their child having an abnormal CF newborn screen if one partner is a CF carrier.
Recommendation 7: Counseling Couples at Risk to Have a Child with CF
When both parents are known carriers for CF, available prenatal and pre-implantation diagnostic testing should be offered. Prenatal facilitation of a monitoring plan should begin for couples at risk or who continue a pregnancy known to have CF, and postnatal evaluation through sweat testing and state newborn screening (NBS) programs, should be discussed.
Recommendation 8: The R117H/Poly T and 5T/Thymidine/Guanine (TG) Tract Alleles
If a client is found to carry an R117H mutation, it is important to ensure the testing laboratory performs reflex testing for poly T status along with studies to determine the cis/trans orientation of the poly T alleles. In the absence of an R117H mutation, assessment of the intron 8 poly T or TG tracts is not recommended for routine CF carrier testing.
Recommendation 9: Individuals with ≥2 Mutations Identified by Carrier Screening
Identification of two or more mutations in a patient referred for routine carrier screening should lead to a referral for clinical diagnostic evaluation. If the mutations identified are uncommon CFTR sequence variants, the likelihood of pathogenicity may be refined through determination of phase (cis/trans orientation).
Recommendation 10: CF Genotype/Phenotype Correlations
While some broad correlations can be made between genotype and anticipated phenotype, genetic counselors should not counsel regarding severity of disease course based on published case reports or individual patient experience.
Obstetrics and Gynecology
Advanced Practice Nurses
Allied Health Personnel
Health Care Providers
Psychologists/Non-physician Behavioral Health Clinicians
- To provide practice recommendations for genetic counselors whose clients are considering cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier testing or seeking information regarding CF molecular test results
- To provide updated information about the natural history, diagnosis, and treatment of CF and related conditions
- To supplement genetic counselors' knowledge and understanding of the available carrier screening and diagnostic testing options
- To describe the current state of genotype/phenotype correlations for CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) mutations and an approach to interpreting both novel and previously described variants
- To provide a framework for genetic counselors to assist clients' decision-making regarding CF carrier testing, prenatal diagnosis, and pregnancy management
- Pregnant women and their partners, and couples planning a pregnancy
- Individuals who are considering cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier testing or who are seeking information regarding CF molecular test results
- Genetic counseling about cystic fibrosis (CF)
- Carrier testing for CF for all women of reproductive age
- Pre-test risk assessment based on family history, ethnic background, and predicted residual risk to have a child with CF
- CF carrier testing based on included mutations
- Counseling of couples at risk to have a child with CF
- Reflex testing for poly T status
- Referral for clinical diagnostic evaluation
- Risk of cystic fibrosis (CF)
- Mutation detection rate
- Effectiveness of genetic counseling
- Strength of genotype/phenotype correlations
Searches of Electronic Databases
The guideline authors searched the PubMed database in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013 using the terms cystic fibrosis diagnosis, sweat test, cystic fibrosis practice guidelines, cystic fibrosis genotype/phenotype, cystic fibrosis newborn screening, cystic fibrosis carrier screening, and cystic fibrosis genetic counseling. English-language papers published in the United States and abroad were reviewed.
Each practice guideline focuses on a clinical or practice-based issue, and is the result of a review and analysis of current professional literature believed to be reliable.
The practice guidelines were developed by members of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC).
A formal cost analysis was not performed and published cost analyses were not reviewed.
The type of evidence supporting the recommendations is not specifically stated.
Appropriate use of molecular testing for determination of cystic fibrosis carrier status
- In cases where one member of a couple has been identified as a cystic fibrosis (CF) carrier and the second has had negative carrier test results, the counseling issues may become more challenging. Framing the residual risk in alternative formats may be helpful. Some patients may have negative emotional, cognitive, and/or behavioral responses to information they find to be ambiguous, and it can be helpful to explore feelings and perceptions about what it would be like to have a child with CF. It is also important to explore whether there are moral, religious, or cultural factors playing a role in the response.
- Informing patients about the role CF newborn screening in identifying CF patients with rare mutations and preparing patients for the potential to have a (likely false) positive CF newborn screen if their newborn carries one mutation may help to alleviate post-partum concerns.
- The practice guidelines of the National Society of Genetic Counselors (NSGC) are developed by members of the NSGC to assist genetic counselors and other health care providers in making decisions about appropriate management of genetic concerns, including access to and/or delivery of services. Each practice guideline focuses on a clinical or practice-based issue, and is the result of a review and analysis of current professional literature believed to be reliable. As such, information and recommendations within the NSGC practice guidelines reflect the current scientific and clinical knowledge at the time of publication, are only current as of their publication date, and are subject to change without notice as advances emerge.
- In addition, variations in practice, which take into account the needs of the individual patient and the resources and limitations unique to the institution or type of practice, may warrant approaches, treatments and/or procedures that differ from the recommendations outlined in this guideline. Therefore, these recommendations should not be construed as dictating an exclusive course of management, nor does the use of such recommendations guarantee a particular outcome. Genetic counseling practice guidelines are never intended to displace a health care provider's best medical judgment based on the clinical circumstances of a particular patient or patient population.
- Practice guidelines are published by NSGC for educational and informational purposes only, and NSGC does not "approve" or "endorse" any specific methods, practices, or sources of information.
An implementation strategy was not provided.
|Langfelder-Schwind E, Karczeski B, Strecker MN, Redman J, Sugarman EA, Zaleski C, Brown T, Keiles S, Powers A, Ghate S, Darrah R. Molecular testing for cystic fibrosis carrier status practice guidelines: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2014 Feb;23(1):5-15. [74 references] PubMed|
Not applicable: The guideline was not adapted from another source.
2005 Feb (revised 2014 Feb)
National Society of Genetic Counselors - Medical Specialty Society
National Society of Genetic Counselors
Authors: Elinor Langfelder-Schwind, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; Barbara Karczeski, DNA Diagnostic Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA; Michelle N. Strecker, CombiMatrix Diagnostics, Irvine, CA, USA; Joy Redman, Quest Diagnostics, San Juan Capistrano, CA, USA; Elaine A. Sugarman, Integrated Genetics, Westborough, MA, USA; Christina Zaleski, Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, WI, USA, Prevention Genetics, Marshfield, WI, USA; Trisha Brown, Shama Consulting, Clayton, CA, USA; Steven Keiles, Ambry Genetics, Aliso Viejo, CA, USA; Amy Powers, University of Minnesota Medical Center, Fairview, Minneapolis, MN, USA; Sumheda Ghate, St. Vincent's Hospital, Green Bay, WI, USA; Rebecca Darrah, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
This is the current release of the guideline.
This guideline updates a previous version: Langfelder-Schwind E, Kloza E, Sugarman E, Pettersen B, Brown T, Jensen K, Marcus S, Redman J. Cystic fibrosis prenatal screening in genetic counseling practice: recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns. 2005 Feb;14(1):1-15.
Electronic copies: Available to subscribers from the Journal of Genetic Counseling Web site .
Print copies: Available from the National Society of Genetic Counselors, 233 Canterbury Drive, Wallingford, PA 19086-7608; Web site: www.nsgc.org .
The following is available:
- Bennett RL, French KS, Resta RG, Doyle DL. Standardized human pedigree nomenclature: update and assessment of the recommendations of the National Society of Genetic Counselors. J Genet Couns 2008 Oct;17(5):424-33. Available to subscribers from the Journal of Genetic Counseling Web site .
This NGC summary was completed by ECRI on March 22, 2006. The information was verified by the guideline developer on May 3, 2006. This NGC summary was updated by ECRI Institute on January 27, 2014. The updated information was verified by the guideline developer on February 17, 2014.
This NGC summary is based on the original guideline, which is subject to the guideline developer's copyright restrictions.
The National Guideline Clearinghouse™ (NGC) does not develop, produce, approve, or endorse the guidelines represented on this site.
All guidelines summarized by NGC and hosted on our site are produced under the auspices of medical specialty societies, relevant professional associations, public or private organizations, other government agencies, health care organizations or plans, and similar entities.
Guidelines represented on the NGC Web site are submitted by guideline developers, and are screened solely to determine that they meet the NGC Inclusion Criteria.
NGC, AHRQ, and its contractor ECRI Institute make no warranties concerning the content or clinical efficacy or effectiveness of the clinical practice guidelines and related materials represented on this site. Moreover, the views and opinions of developers or authors of guidelines represented on this site do not necessarily state or reflect those of NGC, AHRQ, or its contractor ECRI Institute, and inclusion or hosting of guidelines in NGC may not be used for advertising or commercial endorsement purposes.
Readers with questions regarding guideline content are directed to contact the guideline developer.